Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal workforce has submitted a motion to dismiss promises in a lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a female in 1991.

Linked: Stevie J. Shares Viral Film Of “What A Actual Diddy Get collectively Seems to be like Like” (Verify out)

Extra Info Relating to Diddy’s Noted Reaction To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit

In accordance to AP News, Combs’ authorized employees filed the motion on Friday, April 26. The new music mogul’s authorized workforce is reportedly asserting that Diddy cannot be sued for particular statements in the lawsuit due to the truth “certain laws didn’t exist” when the incidents allegedly transpired in 1991.

Diddy’s legal group is reportedly inquiring for Joi Dickerson-Neal’s statements about “revenge porn and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with prejudice.”

CNN notes that Combs’ lawyers are continuing to label Dickerson-Neal’s allegations “false, offensive, and salacious.” Furthermore, Diddy’s lawyers are reportedly inquiring that “allegations versus Combs’ company” be dismissed as really nicely. To be conscious, TMZ stories that the request refers to Diddy’s providers, “Bad Boy Documents or Unfavorable Boy Leisure.”

On the other hand, TMZ notes that Diddy’s workforce has not filed to dismiss the initially “two counts” in the lawsuit. All these promises allege Combs inflicted “assault,” battery, and “intentional infliction of psychological distress” on the plaintiff.

Added Info With regards to The Lawsuit & Allegations

As The Shade Location beforehand noted, Dickerson-Neal submitted the suit towards Combs in November 2023. In addition, the match was reportedly submitted below New York’s Grownup Survivors Act.

At the time, it was noted that Dickerson-Neal accused Diddy of sexually assaulting her quickly right after a date in 1991. Diddy allegedly gave the female a drug. Then, allegedly sexually assaulted her at a new music studio.

In accordance to AP News, the girl accused Combs of recording the assault. Furthermore, she alleged he shared the footage with close mates.

In an initial response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the mogul reportedly denied the allegations. In addition, they labeled the statements a “money grab.”

“This final-moment lawsuit is an case in point of how a nicely-intentioned regulation can be turned on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-12 months-outdated tale is constructed up and not credible. Mr. Combs by no means assaulted her, and she implicates corporations that did not exist. This is purely a funds get and virtually nothing at all added,” their assertion study via, per New York Create-up.

Related: REVOLT Reacts Following Diddy Measures Down As Corporation Chairman Amid Assault Allegations