Deion Sanders: Top Choice for Cowboys’ Head Coach, Says Pearson
Stoney Westmoreland, a notable actor from Disney Channel’s “Andi Mack,” is currently facing significant challenges in his new job at an ice cream shop. Following a past arrest and conviction related to online interactions with a minor, he is experiencing harassment that is causing him distress. The impact of his past legal issues appears to be following him into his professional life, affecting his ability to work peacefully and enjoy his new role in the community.
Stoney Westmoreland has taken legal action to protect himself from a former neighbor who has been persistently showing up at the Cold Stone Creamery where he is employed. This neighbor’s behavior has led Westmoreland to seek a restraining order after feeling increasingly threatened. The harassment has reportedly escalated, creating a hostile work environment for him and raising concerns for his personal safety while he tries to rebuild his life and career.
In his legal filings, Westmoreland claims that the neighbor has been spreading malicious rumors about him to the store’s owner and manager. These false statements have led to uncomfortable confrontations with customers at Cold Stone, where the neighbor has accused him of being a “child rapist.” This harassment is not only damaging to Westmoreland’s reputation but is also causing him significant emotional distress as he faces these unfounded allegations every day while trying to earn a living.
Westmoreland reports that his harasser has shown up at both the ice cream shop and a nearby business on multiple occasions, including December 21, 22, 26, and 27. The individual allegedly warned patrons about the “unregistered child sex offender” rumored to be working at the establishment. Such tactics not only intimidate Westmoreland but also create a toxic environment for customers and staff, making it difficult for him to perform his job effectively and without fear.
Westmoreland asserts that the neighbor has been fabricating lies about his past legal issues, although the court documents do not specify which claims he disputes. This lack of clarity raises questions regarding the nature of the allegations and the potential motivations behind the neighbor’s actions. The situation highlights the challenges individuals face when trying to rebuild their lives after legal troubles, especially when confronted with ongoing harassment and misinformation.
As previously reported, Westmoreland was arrested in 2018 for enticing a minor online, a serious charge that involved him attempting to engage in sexual activity with someone he believed to be 13 years old. This past conviction continues to haunt him, casting a long shadow over his efforts to reintegrate into society. The stigma associated with such charges can severely impact an individual’s ability to find employment and live a peaceful life, particularly in a public-facing job like his.
After pleading guilty to a lesser charge, Westmoreland received a two-year jail sentence. Although he has since been released and is trying to move forward in Los Angeles, he fears that the harassment from his alleged tormentor could escalate into violence. He describes the neighbor as exhibiting erratic behavior, claiming that the man seems to be “trembling as if about to snap” when he appears at the store. Such fears are valid, given the history of harassment he has experienced.
In response to the ongoing harassment, Westmoreland is seeking a temporary restraining order that would legally obligate the neighbor to maintain a distance of 50 yards from both his home and workplace. This legal measure aims to protect Westmoreland from further intimidation and harassment, allowing him to work without fear of encountering his accuser. Such protective orders are vital for individuals who feel threatened and need to reclaim their peace of mind.
The judge has granted the temporary restraining order, scheduling a hearing for February to allow both parties to present their arguments. This legal outcome provides Westmoreland a temporary reprieve from the harassment, but it also emphasizes the importance of addressing such issues in a judicial setting to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals facing similar circumstances.