A groundbreaking global economic study has revealed alarming insights into the impact of artificial intelligence on the creative industries, particularly highlighting that professionals within the music industry may face a staggering loss of over 20% of their income in just three years. This report, commissioned by the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), underscores the urgent need for new legislation aimed at safeguarding the rights and earnings of its five million members and others in the creative sector.

The findings indicate that without the implementation of protective laws, corporations will be free to exploit AI-generated music derived from inadequately protected copyrighted content created by artists. This scenario poses a risk where these companies could significantly profit from human-created music without compensating the original artists, raising ethical and economic concerns.

READ MORE: Singers Offered AI Voice Cloning by World’s Biggest Record Label

This situation could lead to a dramatic surge in corporate profits while artists and numerous professionals within the creative industries could experience a decline in their income exceeding 20% by the year 2028. The CISAC report anticipates that the AI industry will grow exponentially, soaring from a valuation of $3.1 billion globally to an astonishing $67.7 billion.

A pivotal aspect of this debate revolves around the training methods of AI models. Critics argue that when an AI model is trained using an artist’s original work, any new creation produced by the AI becomes the sole property of the AI’s owners. This raises significant questions about ownership rights, as artists whose work is utilized for training may not receive any share of the profits generated from AI adaptations of their creations.

Promoting AI as a Creative Ally Rather Than a Replacement – Insights from Bjorn Ulvaeus

Bjorn Ulvaeus, the renowned member of ABBA and current president of CISAC, has highlighted the critical need for upcoming legislation in Australia and New Zealand. He articulated that such legislative measures are vital to protect creators globally from the potential financial setbacks posed by unregulated AI advancements, as reported by the Guardian.

“By establishing a gold standard in AI policy that safeguards the rights of creators while encouraging responsible technological innovation, Australia and New Zealand can ensure that AI functions as a tool to amplify human creativity instead of diminishing it,” Ulvaeus expressed. His remarks underscore the broader implications of these decisions, stating, “The world is observing, and the outcomes will reverberate well beyond these borders.”

Dean Ormston, representing Apra Amcos, the Australian organization dedicated to music rights management, echoed the sentiment that immediate legislative action is essential. “It’s the creators who are at the greatest risk,” he asserted, emphasizing the integral role of human creativity in the industry.

“Our industry flourishes on human creativity. It is imperative that governments take the initiative and act decisively to preserve the livelihoods of creators and secure the future of our vibrant creative industries,” Ormston concluded.