Blake Edwards’ Breakfast at Tiffany’s, primarily based on the Truman Capote novel of the identical name, is usually viewed as a classic of American cinema. It’s usually remembered for the sweet appreciate story in between its two primary characters, Holly Golightly (Audrey Hepburn) and Paul Varjak (George William Peppard) and, of course, for Hepburn’s dazzling style appears. Who could ever overlook Hepburn’s soothing voice singing “Moon River” as she lightly strums a guitar out her New York window? However, below the glitz and glamor of its exterior lies a dark underbelly, complete of problematic components that render Breakfast at Tiffany’s much less charming than a lot of fans may perhaps recall. For a single, there is a horrific case of yellowface in the type of Mickey Rooney‘s character, Mr. Yunioshi. As atrocious as this is on its personal, the character of Holly Golightly herself has a darker truth that peels back the cover of glamorous urbanity.

Breakfast at Tiffany’s

Breakfast at Tiffany’s is a romantic comedy film by director Blake Edwards and is primarily based on Truman Capote’s 1958 novella. The 1961 film stars Buddy Ebsen, Audrey Hepburn, Patricia Neal, and George Peppard. The plot revolves about Holly Golightly as she falls in appreciate and the trials and tribulations that come along with it.
 

Release Date

October 6, 1961

Director

Blake Edwards

Cast

Audrey Hepburn , George Peppard , Patricia Neal , Buddy Ebsen , Martin Balsam , José Luis de Villalonga

Runtime

115 minutes

Writers

Truman Capote , George Axelrod

What Does Holly Golightly Do in ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’?

Firstly, the air wants to be cleared about the profession of Ms. Golightly, who, in 1961, may perhaps have required to hide it. In extra contemporary instances, it can basically be stated that she’s a sex worker of some stripe. The profession, getting extra recognized types in today’s planet, largely does not hold the identical stigma that it did in 1961, which is probably why the film tries to hint and intimate at the plainly apparent. Today, there is also a entire spectrum of activities covered below “sex work” as a basic term (all of which would’ve been discouraged in cinema at that time). Golightly is noticed entertaining guys of status and wealth as nicely as recognized mafia associates. She even describes a mysterious sort of “photo” she may perhaps agree to take with her neighbor, Mr. Yunioshi (extra on him later). Since she has no other stated supply of earnings, the audience is left to draw their personal conclusion as to her income stream considering the fact that even in 1961, apartments in New York City didn’t come low cost. Whichever view a single requires, something even slightly risque was not probably to make it previous modern censors, in particular in an era when tv couples usually slept in separate beds.

Related

Why Marilyn Monroe Turned Down ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’

“You contact oneself a totally free spirit, a wild factor.”

In an interview with Playboy (by means of The New Yorker), nevertheless, author Truman Capote was quoted as saying that the character of Holly Golightly was an “American geisha,” and that she was “not precisely a call girl.” While this distinction may perhaps hold weight in the novella, the movie’s portrayal of Golightly is not so ambiguous. Whether Edwards intentionally did not make such a distinction, or didn’t believe a single existed, is unknown. Since today’s society is in a position to talk about sex (and sex function) extra openly, what ever the solutions have been that Golightly offered would nevertheless fall squarely inside the modern spectrum (which is an expansion of what would’ve also been deemed sex function in 1961). We do know from situations in the film that strongly hint at this, but the most apparent and germane is when Golightly mentions getting $50 for the “powder room.” Even provided the price of inflation, only the most purposely obtuse viewer will see this as something but an apparent exchange of cash for solutions rendered.

Why Did ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s Hide Holly’s Sex Work?

So, why steep the truth in a clandestine metaphor? The apparent answer is that audiences are supposed to appreciate Holly Golightly Holly’s the lady each and every young man desires to marry, and each and every older man desires as his daughter. But in 1961, the charming top lady of a significant film couldn’t be a sex worker. Not simply because there was a dearth of them in 1961, nor was it much less profitable or recognized than now, but art tends to cycle in between the perfect and the actual (The Hays Code sought to enforce the former). The cultural modifications of the ‘60s and ‘70s paved the way for a more open (though not completely so) society where stories can feature sex workers in any role. This begs the question that if Breakfast at Tiffany’s have been created now, could Holly Golightly be a sex worker in an overt way? We can wait for a reboot, but it does not genuinely matter simply because now, as ought to have been the case in her day, she can be what ever she desires.

Mickey Rooney’s ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s Character Is a Horrific Case of Yellowface

However, if the film have been created now, it would undoubtedly not function the buffoonish, befuddlingly insensitive show of Mickey Rooney (a pretty white man) as Mr. Yunioshi, Holly’s non-descript, East Asian neighbor. Rooney’s impression was not new for the time in truth, it is aspect of a tradition recognized as yellowface, exactly where white actors are created up to appear East Asian, rather than casting somebody of that actual descent. The most glaring instance of this, in addition to Rooney’s aspect in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, is the Charlie Chan series of films in the ‘30s and ‘40s, which began with East Asian actors, and then switched to a Swedish-born lead for the titular character. This, of course, was not due to a lack of East Asian top guys but stemmed extra from increasing anti-Japanese sentiment amongst a lot of white Americans in the lead-up to, and aftermath of, WWII.

The character of Mr. Yunioshi exists in the novella but is provided reasonably small consideration, undoubtedly absolutely nothing close to what viewers see in the film, and is not detailed the identical way. If there have been a populated list of the most insulting East Asian stereotypes, Breakfast at Tiffany’s would verify them all off in a clean sweep. But extra than becoming a caricature of Asian Americans, Rooney’s perplexing efficiency is also a needlessly farcical slapstick bit that appears to match into Vaudeville, rather than the rest of the film. Intended as a sort of comic relief, the audience is forced to ask themselves whether or not the rest of the film is even tense adequate to will need it, provided its halcyon, and rather subdued, mood. Mr. Yunioshi’s appearances on screen look to exist pretty much in a distinct film as if the editors lost the original footage on the cutting area floor and spliced two motion pictures collectively hoping no one would notice.

To go to such excellent lengths to make an undeserved affront to an complete group of individuals, and not even workshop the scenes to see if they match, just adds insult on prime insult. It ought to be noted that the condemnation of Mr. Yunioshi is not a current revelation, as even when it was released, a lot of viewers, which includes critics from The Hollywood Reporter, noted the offensive nature of the character. For that cause, Breakfast at Tiffany’s is usually the topic of boycotts, with a single tv station in the UK, according to The Express, even airing a version with Mickey Rooney’s scenes removed totally.

Despite the controversy, Breakfast at Tiffany’s endures as a muniment of have to-see American cinema, and it is eventually up to viewers to determine for themselves. Every generation judges what is acceptable, and what ought to be culled for posterity primarily based on their personal social norms and morals. Regardless, it can not be denied that Breakfast at Tiffany’s has carved out a location for itself in cinema history — it just could not be as sweet and charming as we like to keep in mind it as.

Breakfast At Tiffany’s is out there to stream on Paramount+

Watch on Paramount+