Donald Trump?s appointed border czar, Tom Homan, has begun utilizing ICE agents and the U.S. military to enforce the deportation of undocumented migrants, fulfilling a promise made during Trump’s presidential campaign. This aggressive strategy raises concerns about the safety and rights of individuals living in the U.S. and has ignited significant debate around immigration policies. The involvement of military resources in domestic immigration enforcement is particularly alarming to many, prompting a reevaluation of current practices and their consequences.

During a segment where they aired a clip from an interview with Tom Homan, who is in charge of overseeing deportation policies, Whoopi Goldberg posed a critical question to her fellow panelists: ?Is this the type of immigration system reform that voters envisioned when they cast their ballots?? This question reflects the deep frustration felt by many regarding the direction of U.S. immigration policy under the current administration and challenges viewers to consider the real-world implications of their electoral choices.

Sara Haines initiated the conversation by expressing uncertainty about whether this harsh deportation approach was what Trump voters anticipated, particularly since none of the hosts had supported his campaign. She went on to compare Trump?s immigration policies with those of President Barack Obama, shedding light on the historical context of deportation practices.

?It is disturbing what we?re witnessing in the news, as the coverage suggests a massive wave of deportations is underway; however, in terms of numbers, President Obama still holds the title of Deporter-In-Chief,? Haines asserted. ?Even if Trump continues at his current pace, he will struggle to reach the annual figures achieved by Obama, which were around 400,000.? This statement emphasizes the complexity of the immigration debate and the need for an honest appraisal of past and present policies.

The talk show host further commented that she believes the current deportation strategy serves primarily as a ?public relations campaign? designed to instill fear among the public. However, she also highlighted that there is a significant lack of transparency regarding the identities of those being deported and whether they genuinely represent a threat to society as “violent criminals.”

?If everyone on these deportation flights is indeed a violent criminal, I think we can all agree that they should leave the country; it’s common sense,? she stated. ?Yet, we are not provided with a clear breakdown of who these individuals actually are.? This lack of clarity raises critical questions about the fairness and ethics of the deportation process.

Alyssa Farah Griffin, who served as the White House director of strategic communications during Trump’s presidency, highlighted that a significant majority, approximately 87% of Americans, support the deportation of undocumented migrants who have committed crimes. This statistic underscores the complex public opinion surrounding immigration and enforcement.

?Countries around the world are grappling with border security and the number of migrants they can accept,? she asserted. ?This is not an issue unique to the United States; it is not inherently xenophobic to care about these matters, as there are both security and economic considerations.? Her comments reflect a broader perspective on the global challenges of immigration and the need for balanced policies.

Griffin further stated that there needs to be a structured system determining who is allowed to enter the United States, such as Afghan refugees currently facing delays in their resettlement due to the Trump administration’s policies. She emphasized that these individuals, who have risked their lives to support the U.S., should be prioritized over economic migrants. ?Those who have assisted our nation and are fleeing for their lives should always have a place here,? she insisted.

In a stark contrast, Sunny Hostin openly condemned the method of mass deportations as ?racist,? firmly believing that certain individuals are intentionally inflicting pain and suffering on specific groups or types of immigrants. Her remarks underline the ongoing debate about the racial implications of current immigration policies and practices.

?There is a very clear message about how this President wants to portray the image of a criminal migrant and what an undocumented migrant looks like, and I believe that is inherently racist,? Hostin stated, earning a round of applause from the audience. This reaction emphasizes the shared concerns among many regarding the narratives being perpetuated in the media and by the government.

Hostin also expressed her belief that racial profiling is occurring during these immigration raids, recounting an incident where a Puerto Rican man and military veteran was questioned during a raid in Newark, New Jersey. This raises serious concerns about the criteria being used to identify individuals for deportation.

?For the umpteenth time, Puerto Ricans are Americans and they disproportionately serve in the military,? she exclaimed passionately. ?I am disheartened, disgusted, and saddened by what I am witnessing.? Her strong sentiments reflect the frustrations of many regarding the treatment of American citizens and the broader implications of immigration enforcement policies.

Ana Navarro wrapped up The View?s discussion on the contentious topic of deportation by reflecting on the remorse expressed by some Trump voters and explaining why she finds it difficult to sympathize with them.

?I recently watched a video over the weekend of Latinos who voted for Trump crying because their abuelas and tios are now being deported. I?m struggling to feel any sympathy for these individuals,? she expressed candidly. This statement highlights the complex emotions surrounding the consequences of political choices and the resulting fallout.

?As an immigrant myself, I understand the desperation that drives people to leave their homeland,? she continued. ?While I firmly believe that anyone who comes to this great nation and commits a crime deserves to face consequences, we must also remember that many good, hard-working individuals are caught in the crossfire of these policies. They are our colleagues, they contribute to our communities, and they are the parents of U.S. citizen children.?

?However, it?s being reported that ICE offices across the country have been assigned quotas. There?s no way they can meet these targets solely with criminal aliens,? she cautioned, describing this strategy as a ?publicity stunt? designed to instill fear among the public. The aim, she argues, is to create a climate of cruelty that affects countless innocent lives.

?People need to prepare themselves because this was expected, and he is following through on his promises,? she warned. This call to action is a reminder of the ongoing uncertainties faced by undocumented communities in the United States.

Navarro emphasized the importance of undocumented immigrants having their documentation in order, advising them to prepare a list of individuals who can care for their children in case their parents are taken into custody and to consult with legal counsel whenever possible. This proactive approach is crucial for ensuring the safety and well-being of families affected by these policies.

?For all those individuals crying right now, feeling regret over their votes, remember there will be another election in two years, and we must endure the pain until then,? she concluded. ?If you want change, make sure you are registered and actively participating in the democratic process.? This powerful message encourages civic engagement and highlights the importance of voter participation in shaping future policies.