President Trump‘s determined attorney, Pam Bondi, has unequivocally stated that she demands the execution of Luigi Mangione for his alleged involvement in homicide. If her wishes are realized, the 26-year-old Ivy League graduate could face an excruciating fate, according to insights shared by TMZ. This case highlights the intense legal battles and moral dilemmas surrounding capital punishment and the criminal justice system in America.

In an exclusive interview, TMZ consulted Corinna Lain, a law professor at the University of Richmond, who provided a detailed analysis of the potential legal repercussions Luigi may face if he is federally convicted of stalking and murdering Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare. Her expertise sheds light on the complexities of federal cases and the grim realities of capital punishment in the United States.

The federal prosecutor will present aggravating factors to the court, and it is crucial that the jury unanimously agrees on these factors before the judge decides whether to impose the death penalty. In federal cases, the death penalty often results in lethal injection, a method that raises numerous ethical and legal questions regarding its implementation and the experiences of those subjected to it.

Professor Lain, an authority on capital punishment, is the author of the book titled, “Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection.” She explains to TMZ that during the execution process, Luigi would be strapped to a gurney in a death chamber, where an executioner would be responsible for locating a suitable vein and inserting a catheter. This chilling description emphasizes the harsh realities of the death penalty and the procedures involved in carrying it out.

Lain elaborates that some inmates may experience multiple needle pricks as executioners search for a viable vein, often due to their poor health or history of drug use. However, in Luigi’s case, being young and healthy means that this should not pose significant challenges during the execution process, raising concerns about the fairness and humanity of such procedures.

Once the catheter is successfully inserted into the vein, Lain explains that non-medical prison guards will carry out the execution using syringes from a separate room known as the “execution anteroom.” This separation raises significant ethical questions about the role of trained medical professionals in the execution process and the implications of using non-medical staff for such critical tasks.

This execution anteroom is adjacent to the actual execution chamber, connected by a tube that runs through a hole in the separating wall. This tube serves a critical function, transporting the necessary drugs from one room to the other, raising further questions about the execution process’s transparency and the experiences of those involved.

At one end of this tube are syringes filled with lethal substances, and the tube connects directly to the catheter needle in the prisoner’s arm. This method of execution highlights the stark and clinical nature of lethal injection, sparking intense debates over its morality and effectiveness in carrying out capital punishment.

Once the execution begins, guards apply pressure on the syringes, delivering Pentobarbital, a drug commonly used in euthanasia, directly into the prisoner’s body. This substance floods the heart and lungs, leading to unconsciousness within moments, and it can take as long as 18 minutes for the individual to die. This distressing timeline emphasizes the need for a critical examination of the lethal injection process and the human experiences entwined with it.

Even after the prisoner has fallen unconscious and is heavily sedated, Lain warns that they may still be experiencing pain without the ability to respond. Scientific evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the drugs used can cause extreme pain and unnecessary suffering, essentially torturing individuals to death. This reality raises profound ethical concerns about the use of lethal injection as a method of capital punishment.

Professor Lain points out that lethal injection can lead to Acute Pulmonary Edema, a condition where fluid rapidly fills the lungs, making it incredibly difficult to breathe and posing serious life-threatening risks. This medical complication underscores the need for thorough scrutiny of lethal injection protocols and the implications for those subjected to such procedures.

Another significant concern arises from the fact that non-medical prison guards are responsible for administering the execution. Lain emphasizes that these guards lack proper medical training, which can result in mistakes such as pushing the syringe too hard, delivering an excessive amount of the drug too quickly, and potentially causing the vein to collapse. This reality raises serious questions about the safety and humanity of the execution process.

When such mistakes occur, the drug can spill into the surrounding tissue, creating a significant medical issue that can lead to severe complications for the prisoner. This highlights the urgent need for reform in the mechanisms of capital punishment and the necessity for trained medical professionals to oversee such critical procedures.

In one alarming case, Lain recounts that a prisoner regained consciousness during his execution, experiencing extreme pain. In another incident, she describes a prisoner who suffered severe chemical burns on both arms, with his skin sloughing off as a result of the execution process. These harrowing accounts emphasize the urgent need for a reevaluation of lethal injection as a humane method of capital punishment.