Mark Geragos expresses strong confidence in his legal abilities, suggesting that he could have successfully defended Hunter Biden against the tax evasion charges. However, he acknowledges that President Biden’s son opted for a guilty plea to avoid further media scrutiny on his family. This decision appears to be a calculated move to protect his family’s reputation while navigating the complex legal landscape surrounding his case.

During an appearance on “TMZ Live” on Monday, Hunter’s lawyer discussed the implications of Hunter’s decision to enter an open plea. This means there was no agreement with the prosecutors about the sentencing terms, raising questions about the strategy behind this risky move. It invites speculation about whether the plea was a tactical decision to mitigate potential fallout or simply a reflection of the legal challenges faced by Hunter in this high-profile case.

Mark Geragos indicated that he had a strong strategy in mind to win Hunter’s case by challenging the government’s arguments in the Delaware gun trial. He suggested that Hunter’s struggles with substance abuse would serve as a key point in his defense, arguing that he was too impaired to have intentionally violated tax codes. This line of defense could have potentially altered the court’s perception of Hunter’s actions and intentions.

Given the strength of Mark’s proposed argument, it raises significant questions as to why Hunter chose to concede defeat by pleading guilty to all nine tax-related charges without putting up a fight. This decision has sparked discussions among legal experts and the public alike regarding the motivations behind such a critical legal move, indicating the complexities involved in his case.

Mark Geragos was pressed for clarification regarding a report that suggested President Biden had intentions to pardon his son before the guilty verdict was rendered in September. This raises critical implications about the timing of Hunter’s plea and whether it was influenced by external factors, including potential political maneuvers within the Biden administration.

Our investigation has provided substantial evidence indicating that Biden had plans to pardon Hunter for over three months. Hunter was reportedly aware that a pardon was forthcoming when he decided to accept the open plea in the tax case. While Mark Geragos has not outright denied this narrative, he has refrained from confirming it, suggesting that the possibility of a pardon was ever-present during their legal strategy discussions.

Mark Geragos has stated that he did not have direct conversations with the White House regarding a potential pardon for Hunter. However, he admits that the possibility of a pardon was always a consideration in their legal strategy, highlighting the complex interplay between legal proceedings and political influences in such high-profile cases.