Iman Shumpert firmly asserts that he has never disclosed any confidential information to the public regarding his tumultuous divorce from Teyana Taylor. This statement comes amidst ongoing speculation and media scrutiny surrounding their relationship, emphasizing Shumpert’s commitment to privacy during this challenging time. He aims to set the record straight about the allegations that have surfaced in media reports, which he believes misrepresent the situation.

The former NBA star’s attorney, Stephen C. Steele, issued a statement to TMZ Sports on Wednesday, asserting that Shumpert categorically denies Taylor’s accusations. He refuted claims that Shumpert had leaked information to the media in an attempt to generate buzz for his new rap music. This denial highlights the attorney’s efforts to protect Shumpert’s reputation during a sensitive period, as they navigate the complexities of their public and private lives.

“My client, Mr. Iman Shumpert, has never, under any circumstances, leaked any allegations or claims stated in any legal documents regarding the divorce,” Steele emphasized. “Mr. Shumpert vehemently denies having provided any information to any media outlet.” This strong statement aims to clarify Shumpert’s position and reassure his supporters that he has handled the situation with integrity.

“Specifically, but without limitation, he denies that he leaked any information that could have served as the basis for the numerous media reports prior to the trial of this matter,” Steele continued. This declaration aims to further clarify the situation and dispel any misconceptions surrounding Shumpert’s involvement in media narratives.

Taylor alleged in court documents on Tuesday the exact opposite, accusing Shumpert of playing a role in recent media reports that she claims misrepresented how their divorce concluded. This accusation adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings and highlights the high stakes involved in the public perception of their split.

Taylor expressed her frustration over the situation, going so far as to request the judge in their case to impose a 20-day jail sentence on Shumpert, along with fines, to serve as a lesson for his alleged actions. This request underscores the emotional turmoil and contentious nature of their divorce proceedings, as both parties seek to protect their interests.

Steele, however, reiterated multiple times in his statement that Shumpert has committed no wrongdoing, reinforcing his client’s commitment to handle the situation ethically and responsibly. This insistence on Shumpert’s innocence reflects the legal team’s strategy to maintain a credible narrative amidst the ongoing public scrutiny.

“As agreed by the parties, and as ordered by the court, he has not, and he is not going to disclose any of the contents of the now-sealed file,” Steele stated, emphasizing that Shumpert is committed to maintaining confidentiality. “Nor will he reveal or discuss the substance or content of any orders or pleadings.” This assurance aims to quell any speculation regarding Shumpert’s intent to share sensitive details about the divorce.

Steele added that Shumpert vows to “continue to comply with the court order sealing the details of this divorce.” This commitment reflects Shumpert’s desire to respect the legal process and maintain the integrity of the proceedings amidst the public interest.

“He has absolutely no interest in discussing any of these personal and private details with any media outlets or any parties indirectly involved with this case.” This statement underlines Shumpert’s intention to keep his personal matters private and shield himself from further media speculation.