Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of President John F. Kennedy, has long been an outspoken critic of his second cousin, RFK Jr. His criticisms reached a new intensity as he took to social media, delivering a barrage of posts that meticulously documented RFK Jr.’s responses during his testimony before the Senate Finance Committee. Schlossberg?s detailed commentary not only reflected his personal stance but also brought to light the broader implications of RFK Jr.’s potential appointment.

In his fervent posts, Schlossberg used strong language, accusing RFK Jr. of being a ?f?king liar? and branding him as an ?Antisemite.? These remarks emerged almost immediately during the hearing, as Schlossberg shared a clip online, exclaiming in all caps, ?JUNIOR CAN?T ANSWER THE EASY ONES.? His emotional response underscored the gravity of the situation and highlighted the contentious nature of the confirmation process.

Schlossberg’s all-caps outburst came in response to Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), who questioned RFK Jr.’s position on vaccines. Wyden expressed concern over the nominee’s inability to provide a straightforward answer to a fundamental question. ?It?s a simple question, and the man Trump wants running our nation?s health care system cannot give a straight reply,? Wyden stated, drawing attention to the seriousness of the nominee’s qualifications.

Wyden shared a video clip showing RFK Jr. seemingly dodging a clear stance on vaccines, creating a perception of inconsistency. During the hearing, RFK Jr. stated under oath that he is not anti-vaccine, despite previously asserting that ?no vaccine is safe and effective.? This contradiction raised eyebrows and fueled further scrutiny from both political opponents and family members.

RFK Jr. then attempted to justify his vaccination stance by stating that all of his children have been vaccinated. However, this claim came after he had previously expressed a desire to ?go back in time and not vaccinate? his children, showcasing a significant inconsistency in his messaging that has not gone unnoticed by observers and critics.

In defending his position, RFK Jr. labeled the question about his vaccination stance ?dishonest,? claiming he was misrepresented during a podcast discussion. He argued that he was cut off before he could clarify that not all vaccines are ?safe and effective? for every individual. However, he failed to address the broader implications of his previous statements, leaving many unconvinced.

Critics in Schlossberg’s comments quickly highlighted that Senator Wyden has accepted approximately $1.5 million from large pharmaceutical companies, raising questions about his impartiality. This revelation, reported by Forbes, added another layer of complexity to the discussions surrounding vaccine safety and the influence of pharmaceutical funding on political figures.

This situation prompted a defensive posture among Schlossberg’s supporters, who were ready to challenge anyone critical of RFK Jr. They argued that the scrutiny faced by RFK Jr. was influenced by personal and political motivations, rather than factual evidence.

Schlossberg continued his tirade by bringing attention to RFK Jr.’s controversial remarks regarding his wife, Cheryl Hines, as her name surfaced during the hearing. He questioned her credibility, labeling her a ?B-list actress,? while asserting, ?Okay? but what about HATING JEWS AND SAYING JEWS MADE COVID.? His comments reflect the intense scrutiny and criticism directed towards RFK Jr. and his family dynamics.

Schlossberg explicitly accused his cousin of being an ?Antisemite? for previously asserting that COVID-19 was a bioweapon engineered to target specific racial groups. These claims were made during the hearing at the request of Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO), further intensifying the scrutiny surrounding RFK Jr.’s statements and beliefs.

RFK Jr. defended himself by stating, ?I did not say it was intentionally targeted,? claiming he was quoting an NIH study. This defense did little to alleviate concerns about the credibility of his statements and their implications for public health policy.

Senator Bennet also confronted RFK Jr. about his previous assertions that Lyme disease is likely a bioweapon, a claim that has been widely debunked by fact-checkers. RFK Jr. conceded to this assertion, yet many experts have dismissed such conspiracy theories as unfounded and harmful.

In a follow-up tweet, Schlossberg expressed his disbelief at RFK Jr.’s motivations, questioning why he would make such statements. He implied that RFK Jr. sought to cultivate a following through sensational claims, branding him as ?GUILTY? for his actions.

Schlossberg was not alone in criticizing RFK Jr.’s testimony; on-site protesters voiced their discontent as Schlossberg shared a clip of RFK Jr. refuting claims that he is ?anti-vaccine or anti-industry.? This public outcry underscored the contentious atmosphere surrounding the confirmation hearing.

In response to RFK Jr.’s claim that he is neither, a voice from the audience shouted, ?You lie!? Schlossberg echoed this sentiment, labeling RFK Jr. a ?F?king liar? while sharing the clip on his social media account. This moment encapsulated the tension and drama of the hearing.

In a later post, Schlossberg reiterated his strong stance, asserting, ?You enjoy lying it?s easier than telling the truth,? which was in reaction to RFK Jr.’s denial of any involvement in the American Samoa measles outbreak. This incident occurred shortly after RFK Jr. visited, raising concerns about his influence and rhetoric in public health matters.

RFK Jr. denied any anti-vaccine sentiments during his visit to American Samoa, despite reports from ABC News indicating that his rhetoric contributed to vaccine hesitancy at a crucial time. The outbreak resulted in 83 deaths among more than 5,700 cases, raising ethical questions about the responsibilities of public figures in health-related discussions.

Senator Bennet confronted RFK Jr. regarding his controversial claim that exposure to pesticides could lead children to identify as transgender. RFK Jr. denied ever making such a statement, yet Bennet presented evidence to the Chairman to support his assertion. Schlossberg chimed in, expressing his disbelief and outrage by calling RFK Jr. a ?LYING SACK OF S?T? in a show of solidarity with Bennet’s criticisms.

As highlighted by ABC News, RFK Jr. has consistently suggested a link between environmental toxins, including those found in drinking water, and gender identity issues in children. However, these claims lack scientific backing and have been widely dismissed by experts, raising ethical concerns about the spreading of misinformation.

RFK Jr. also sidestepped earlier assertions regarding women’s autonomy over abortion, stating that he believes every abortion is a tragedy. This evasive response drew criticism from various senators who felt that such personal beliefs should not impede women’s access to necessary medical care.

Senator Bennet responded to RFK Jr.’s evasive replies, emphasizing that his decisions regarding healthcare are profoundly impactful and should not be treated lightly. He admonished RFK Jr. for what he perceived as dishonesty during his testimony, suggesting that the nominee’s lack of transparency could have serious consequences for the American public.

?LIFE AND DEATH DECISIONS by somebody who cannot tell the truth,? Schlossberg echoed in his commentary. Ultimately, RFK Jr. stated, ?I serve at the pleasure of the president. I will implement his policies.? This statement drew attention to the potential implications of RFK Jr.’s nomination and the policies he would prioritize.