An synthetic intelligence researcher analyzes Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey for correct AI depictions. The 1968 Stanley Kubrick film starring Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood, William Sylvester, and Daniel Richter is predicated on a brief story by sci-fi creator Arthur C. Clarke. The film follows Dr. Dave Bowman (Dullea) and different astronauts as they embark on a mysterious mission. As time goes on, their ship’s laptop system, HAL, begins to exhibit more and more unusual habits.

Sasha Luccioni is an AI researcher at Hugging Face, a world startup that works on accountable AI. In a latest video for Insider, Luccioni rated Kubrick’s 1968 movie for AI accuracy. Overall, she gave it a 2/10. One of the scenes Luccioni analyzed was the lip-reading scene. While there are functions of AI that do lip-reading, they’re extra usually for help than surveillance, in accordance with the AI researcher. Additionally, for the lip-reading to achieve success, the particular person talking should be absolutely dealing with the digital camera with an unobscured face. Luccioni defined:

Because they’re talking from the facet, it could be actually onerous to make use of any of the strategies that we at the moment have for lip-reading since you do not actually see them talking on the digital camera.

Luccioni additionally inspected the scene on the finish of the movie the place HAL’s discs get unplugged, an outdated AI observe. “It’s not implausible as much as very old-fashioned,” mentioned Luccioni. Luccioni additionally mentioned HAL’s stage of self consciousness in the identical scene. She mentioned HAL may certainly concentrate on its drives being unplugged, however past that, the scene will get extra outlandish. Luccioni defined:

HAL can positively concentrate on its drives being unplugged, just like the bodily absence of a drive that was related earlier than that is being disconnected now. So that is positively a type of consciousness, it is a type of decoding bodily data and performing upon that, however whether or not an AI will have the ability to affiliate a disc being unplugged to demise or not current anymore, that is actually extra just like the metaphysical property that could be a little bit much less clear to me.

I might charge this [movie] like a two as a result of
we’re not there but by way of lip-reading and we’re positively not there but by way of self-awareness.

What Luccioni’s 2001: A Space Odyssey Analysis Means

The Movie Didn’t Accurately Predict 2001’s Technological Advancements

Luccioni’s AI skilled evaluation sheds new gentle on 2001: A Space Odyssey. When the movie debuted in 1968, viewers didn’t understand how correct or inaccurate the movie can be to the 12 months 2001. Now that it’s 23 years previous 2001, it’s clear how inaccurate the movie actually was. Even right this moment, in 2024, AI doesn’t have the power to do extremely correct profile lip-readings or perceive that, when its discs are eliminated, it should stop to exist.

At the time of its launch, the film was a artistic perspective on a future that possibly appeared doable. Now, it may be considered as an amusing take a look at how imaginative the creatives of the Nineteen Sixties could possibly be. Though some components of 2001: A Space Odyssey‘s AI are related right this moment, the film was nonetheless fairly off-base when it got here to its predictions.

Our Take On Luccioni’s AI Analysis Of 2001: A Space Odyssey

There’s No Telling What The Future Will Bring

See also  AEW Full Gear 2024's Chaotic Ending: The Real Reason Unveiled

The 1968 movie is predicated on a brief story by sci-fi creator Arthur C. Clarke, which was written in 1948. The chance the AI features of the brief story or movie have been going to be extremely correct to the 12 months 2001 was extremely low, although the start of the movie is taken into account correct by some consultants. Luccioni’s 2/10 score for AI accuracy feels applicable and unsurprising. However, Luccioni made one remark about her score that stood out to us: “We’re not there yet.” 2001: A Space Odyssey isn’t correct for the 12 months 2024, however maybe will probably be sooner or later.

Source: Insider